Programme Governance

Risks, deliverables, RFC/ARB queue, investment tracking, UAT, vendor RACI, and Bangalore onboarding — the governance artefacts from §4, §6, §7, §8, §9 of the SOW.

Open risks
6
2 high
Deliverables
5 / 9
56% docs
Programme spend
$129K
of $259K
UAT pass rate
57%
4 of 7
Risk register

Top risks tracked per SOW §8. Score = Probability × Impact (1–9).

9
R-01Bangalore team onboarding delay
P: High
I: High

Cultural & tooling integration friction with Paris/Hamburg

Mitigation: Dedicated onboarding lead in BLR; weekly 1:1s with Company A Eng leads
Owner: VP Eng
6
R-02Data model conflict
P: Medium
I: High

Different entity schemas for shipment & workflow events

Mitigation: Joint modelling workshop wk 2; canonical schema before coding
Owner: WS-2 Lead
6
R-03Scope creep post-M&A
P: High
I: Medium

Business teams request new features during integration window

Mitigation: Hard feature freeze 12 wks; new asks → post-integration backlog
Owner: Programme PM
6
R-04IAM migration downtime
P: Medium
I: High

SSO cut-over risks breaking auth for existing users

Mitigation: Phased tenant migration; rollback runbook; out-of-hours cutover
Owner: CISO
4
R-05Kafka topic explosion
P: Low
I: High

Per-tenant partitioning may exceed cluster capacity

Mitigation: Topic governance policy; capacity planning review wk 6
Owner: WS-2 Lead
6
R-06Customer regression
P: Medium
I: High

Existing Company A/Company B customers hit issues during migration

Mitigation: Shadow traffic, contract tests, customer comms plan
Owner: CTO